284 U.S. 599

284 U.S. 599

52 S.Ct. 264

76 L.Ed. 514

Edgar Percy LEWIS et al., petitioners,
v.
Marshall S. REYNOLDS, Individually and as Collector of Internal Revenue.

No. 115.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 15, 1932

1

In this cause it is ordered that the following words be deleted from the sixth paragraph, of the opinion announced on January 4, 1932:

2

‘Also that at the time of his last decision he was restricted to consideration of the demand for refund and determination of whether the trustees were entitled to deduct the State inheritance taxes.’

3

Otherwise the opinion will stand as heretofore announced.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 284 U.S. 599

Recent Posts

WINTERBOTTOM v. WRIGHT, 152 Eng. Rep. 402 (Ex. 1842).

WINTERBOTTOM v. WRIGHT In the Exchequer, June 6, 1842. Reported in 10 Meeson & Welsby,…

3 weeks ago

YU v. POZNIAK-RICE, Cal. App. No. B337415 (July 21, 2025)

Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

5 months ago

WING INFLATABLES, INC. v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, Cal. App. No. A173263 (July 21, 2025)

Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

5 months ago

NASRALLAH v. BARR, 590 U.S. 573 (2020)

140 S.Ct. 1683 (2020)590 U.S. 573 Nidal Khalid NASRALLAH, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney…

7 months ago

THOLE v. U.S. BANK N.A., 590 U.S. 538

140 S.Ct. 1615 (2020)590 US 538207 L. Ed. 2d 85 James J. THOLE, et al.,…

7 months ago

BANISTER v. DAVIS, 590 U.S. 504

140 S.Ct. 1698 (2020)590 U.S. 504 Gregory Dean BANISTER, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas…

7 months ago