266 U.S. 291

266 U.S. 291

45 S.Ct. 63

69 L.Ed. 293

ENDICOTT-JOHNSON CORPORATION, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
William H. SMITH.

No. 64.

Argued Oct. 13, 1924.

Decided Nov. 17, 1924.

Mr. Maurice E. Page, of Endicott, N. Y., for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Moe Goldstein, of Binghampton, N. Y. for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

1

This case, like Endicott-Johnson Corporation v. Encyclopedia Press, Inc. (No. 41), 266 U. S. 285, 45 S. Ct. 61, 69 L. Ed. ——, just decided, involves the constitutional validity of section 1391 of the New York Code of Civil Procedure. Smith v. Endicott-Johnson Corporation (Sup.) 189 N. Y. S. 673; Id., 199 App. Div. 194, 192 N. Y. S. 121; Id., 234 N. Y. 628, 138 N. E. 474. It is in all respects similar to the Encyclopedia Press Case and governed by the decision therein.

The judgment is

2

Affirmed.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 266 U.S. 291

Recent Posts

WINTERBOTTOM v. WRIGHT, 152 Eng. Rep. 402 (Ex. 1842).

WINTERBOTTOM v. WRIGHT In the Exchequer, June 6, 1842. Reported in 10 Meeson & Welsby,…

3 weeks ago

YU v. POZNIAK-RICE, Cal. App. No. B337415 (July 21, 2025)

Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

5 months ago

WING INFLATABLES, INC. v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, Cal. App. No. A173263 (July 21, 2025)

Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

5 months ago

NASRALLAH v. BARR, 590 U.S. 573 (2020)

140 S.Ct. 1683 (2020)590 U.S. 573 Nidal Khalid NASRALLAH, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney…

7 months ago

THOLE v. U.S. BANK N.A., 590 U.S. 538

140 S.Ct. 1615 (2020)590 US 538207 L. Ed. 2d 85 James J. THOLE, et al.,…

7 months ago

BANISTER v. DAVIS, 590 U.S. 504

140 S.Ct. 1698 (2020)590 U.S. 504 Gregory Dean BANISTER, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas…

7 months ago