248 U.S. 497

39 S.Ct. 171

63 L.Ed. 381

BANK OF CALIFORNIA, NATIONAL ASS’N,
v.
ROBERTS, Treasurer of State of California.

No. 115.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 27, 1919

Submitted Oct. 14, 1918.

Mr. E. S. Pillsbury, Mr. F. D. Madison, Mr. Alfred Sutro, and Mr. Oscar Sutro, all of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error.

PER CURIAM.

1

This case is controlled by the opinion in Bank of California Richardson. 248 U. S. 476, 39 Sup. Ct. 165, 63 L. Ed. 372, just decided. Indeed, it was submitted without briefs upon the briefs filed in that case. For the reasons stated in the previous case, therefore, the judgment here must be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 248 U.S. 497

Recent Posts

WINTERBOTTOM v. WRIGHT, 152 Eng. Rep. 402 (Ex. 1842).

WINTERBOTTOM v. WRIGHT In the Exchequer, June 6, 1842. Reported in 10 Meeson & Welsby,…

3 weeks ago

YU v. POZNIAK-RICE, Cal. App. No. B337415 (July 21, 2025)

Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

5 months ago

WING INFLATABLES, INC. v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, Cal. App. No. A173263 (July 21, 2025)

Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

5 months ago

NASRALLAH v. BARR, 590 U.S. 573 (2020)

140 S.Ct. 1683 (2020)590 U.S. 573 Nidal Khalid NASRALLAH, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney…

7 months ago

THOLE v. U.S. BANK N.A., 590 U.S. 538

140 S.Ct. 1615 (2020)590 US 538207 L. Ed. 2d 85 James J. THOLE, et al.,…

7 months ago

BANISTER v. DAVIS, 590 U.S. 504

140 S.Ct. 1698 (2020)590 U.S. 504 Gregory Dean BANISTER, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas…

7 months ago